Ok Ryan it seems that with
Ok Ryan it seems that with each post of yours you are digging yourself into a deeper and deeper hole (who’s I shall not ask)

No need to throw a fit as it is my opinion that your article is rubbish and I’ll stand by it. If you write an article then you better have the (you know what) to receive other peoples comments / criticism as well especially when what you have written is factually incorrect. Next time before you begin to write an article, do a little bit of thinking and make sure you get your facts right.

First and foremost 4 fifties in 9 innings is 44% and not 30%. We have already established that you know nothing about cricket, you cannot read and now what? you cannot count either? These are not personal attacks as I am merely highlighting the many incorrect statements that you seem to be making right from the original article.

However, I never fail to give credit where its due and you are absolutely correct when you said that last season under Yuvraj Singh, Kings XI at this stage had already notched up three wins after losing their first two games. What you failed to mention and / or conveniently ignored was the fact that Sanga was the man of the match in 2 of those 3 wins.

Mahela (arguably) has done well enough for a cricketer who was paid 475K and Sanga without a shadow of doubt has more than justified the money that he was paid.

Are you another typical Sri Lankan burning with jealousy that Sanga and Mahela are making big money and hence, the reason for this bitterness? Take a chill pill dude cause at the rate you are going you might drop dead with a heart attack very soon.

Given your warped logic, M.S Dhoni (who was paid more than double the amount that Sanga was paid) has been an absolute failure in the IPL as he scored only 74 runs more than Sanga in the IPL season 1 in 2008 despite batting in 5 innings more than Sanga and in IPL season 2 in 2009 he scored exactly the same amount of runs as Sanga.

The same applies to Sachin Tendulkar, Yuvraj Singh, Virender Sehwag and a host of others and we could use your screwed up logic to deduce the same for many bowlers as well.

So being the cricketing authority that you project yourself to be, if you claim that it is unlikely that any franchise would want to bid for Sanga next season based on his performance, then those players who were paid way more than Sanga like the ones mentioned above and performed either as well as him or worse are also unlikely to receive any bids from any franchises next year. This of course is the conclusion that we can come to based on your warped logic.

What a bloody Joke!!!! Are for you real?

Don’t let your personal issues with cricketers cloud your good judgement because that is clearly what has happened here.

Ryan,
In your absolute
Ryan,

In your absolute rubbish of an article above you came up with crap and concluded that Sanga was a failure in the IPL and despite his franchise securing his contract for 3 years in 2008 he has nothing to show for it.

In my response to the above I proved with FACTS without a shadow of doubt that your claim above was nothing but garbage because -:

1/ Sanga was the second best batsman in the IPL season 1 in 2008 for Kings XI Punjab, scoring 4 fifties in 9 innings (from 10 matches) at an Avg of nearly 36.

2/ Sanga was also the team’s most consistent batsman in the games won by Kings XI Punjab in 2009 when he averaged 51 with the bat in the 7 games that the Kings XI won in 2009.

3/ In the 7 games that the Kings XI Punjab won in 2009 Sanga and Mahela combined to win 4 man of the match awards which means that the Sri Lankan pair were responsible for playing a key role in more than 50% of the wins secured by Kings XI Punjab in 2009.

So Sanga in particular has more than justified his selection by the Kings XI owners by being their most consistent performer in the first two seasons.

You can continue to sit in front of your computer like a disgruntled child and continue to throw toys out of your pram, thumping your chest every now and then.

In the mean time anyone else with a reasonable level of intelligence that reads my comments in response to that crap you have posted above (in the garb of a cricketing article) will know that you have been pawned and exposed big time by me!

Cheers!